ID WEEK 2017
SAN DIEGO – (FRONTLINE MEDICAL NEWS)After other strategies to reduce inappropriate testing for Clostridium difficile infection did not provide adequate reductions in inappropriate orders, a “hard stop” protocol, which prevents testing if specific conditions are not met, reduced the rate of testing by 42% without any incidence of delayed diagnosis, according to data presented at ID Week 2017.
“Testing stewardship is really critical to minimize the frequency of false-positive [Clostridium difficile infection] cases, which of course lead to harm. They lead to inappropriate treatment, prolonged length of stay, and patient dissatisfaction,” reported Marci L. Drees, MD, Infection Prevention Officer and Hospital Epidemiologist, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Del.
The move to a hard stop protocol occurred after several events. The first of these was a switch to an all-Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing protocol. Previously, PCR was employed as a second step after an initial positive enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Almost immediately, there was a 20% to 25% jump in the proportion of positive tests due to colonization rather than active infection.
“Of course, we did, at the time, educate our clinicians about this new testing algorithm, explaining how it is so much more sensitive and that they need to be smarter about who they are testing. But as we saw the cases roll in, we noticed that many of the [colonization] cases were in patients with a history of recent laxative use,” Dr. Drees recounted.
This led initially to a “soft stop” protocol in which clinicians ordering C. difficile–infection testing received an alert if laxatives had been ordered within the previous 24 hours. The alert provided details about the laxatives and suggested that the order for C. difficile–infection testing be reconsidered. This alert was no more than a suggestion, but it did reduce C. difficile–infection testing orders by 25% at first.
“The problem was that the alert lost effect over time as people got used to seeing it and clicked right through it,” Dr. Drees explained.
Despite the diminishing effect of the soft stop, no further steps were planned until a new set of data alerted the infectious disease department that C. difficile–infection rates were higher than benchmarks. This prompted concern among the hospital leadership and led to creation of a multidisciplinary team that was given the task to dig deeper for the source of problems and develop strategies to lower rates of inappropriate testing.
When that team did their initial analysis, what really came to the front was that about half the cases that had been identified as hospital-onset C. difficile were likely only C. difficile colonizations. They either had received laxatives prior to their test or they did not have significant diarrhea,” Dr. Drees said.
It was this finding that prompted a hard stop protocol to be built into C. difficile–infection test orders. In this protocol, which is executed only in patients who have been hospitalized for at least 36 hours, two conditions must be met sequentially for the testing order to proceed. The first is there must be documentation of at least two episodes of diarrhea in the prior 24 hours. If this condition is met, then the ordering system asks for verification that the patient has not received a laxative in the prior 24 hours.
“If either of these criteria are not met, the order can only proceed if the clinician calls the lab for an override,” Dr. Drees explained. Although the person answering the phone in the laboratory does not require any additional documentation or justification, the person ordering the test must enter the name of the person in the laboratory with whom they spoke. If this field is not filled in, the order will not proceed.
Prior to the hard stop, there was an average of 12 C. difficile–infection tests ordered per day. After the hard stop, the average fell to 7 per day, a 42% decline, according to Dr. Drees. C. difficile-infection cases did not increase, and there were no incidences of delayed diagnosis resulting in adverse clinical consequences.
Of the 157 overrides on the hard stop, representing 15% of all orders, only 11% produced a positive C. difficile-infection result. It was noted that almost one third of the overrides did not follow the protocol.
“What I mean is that they did not actually call the lab. They put in their own name [for the field requiring the name of a lab worker] or they put in Mickey Mouse or they put in something, so the order would proceed,” Dr. Drees said. After followup in those cases, “we have not had repeat offenders.”
Even a hard stop is likely to have diminishing efficacy over time as clinicians identify work-arounds, Dr. Drees acknowledged. For example, there is concern that therapy for CDI will be ordered without testing, although this has not yet been detected. However, the hard stop has been more effective and shown a longer duration of effect than the soft stop, according to Dr. Drees. Although Dr. Drees acknowledged that there have been exceptions, the hard stop has “generally been well accepted.”
Dr. Drees reported that she has no financial relationships relevant to this topic.
idp@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @IDPractitioner
