EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM EUROECHO-IMAGING 2014
VIENNA (FRONTLINE MEDICAL NEWS) – Rapid echocardiographic assessment has become routine for many patients who arrive at an emergency department with suspected acute heart failure, and experts consider these examinations critical for quickly getting patients on the right treatment.
Growing use and the important role for emergency echo exams prompted the European echocardiography community to issue in 2014 both recommendations and a position statement on the practice.
With their actions, European echocardiographers joined their U.S. colleagues who had earlier endorsed rapid, focused echocardiography exams. The European position also highlighted the limitations and pitfalls of emergency echo and the need for proper training.
Use of limited, directed, ultrasound heart examinations on an emergency basis by physicians who are not cardiologists is “an irreversible process, but without appropriate training it may become dangerous,” Dr. Nuno Cardim said at the annual meeting of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).
A focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) examination for patients with an emergency cardiac condition such as acute heart failure is not a new concept. In 2010, the American Society of Echocardiography and the American College of Emergency Physicians jointly issued a consensus statement on emergency FoCUS ( J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2010;23:1225-30 ), and the American Society of Echocardiography followed with additional recommendations in 2013 that also dealt with nonemergency uses for FoCUS ( J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2013;26:567-81 ).
In its 2014 position statement released last May, the EACVI directly addressed FoCUS for the first time ( Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014:15;956-60 ). The statement acknowledged the important role for a circumscribed, point-of-care ultrasound exam in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and in other critical cardiac conditions, but highlighted that a FoCUS exam does not substitute for a comprehensive echocardiographic exam, and that FoCUS should only be done by properly trained clinicians who appreciate the limits of a FoCUS exam.
The EASVI recommendations, which came out a few months later in collaboration with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association , said that “echocardiography is now recommended (where appropriately trained practitioners are available) in the management of cardiac arrest. However, FoCUS should always be used and interpreted thoughtfully, since this fundamentally limited approach may lead to missing/misinterpretation of important findings unless the practitioner is aware of its (and their) limitations” ( Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014 [doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeu210] ).
“Of course all patients with suspected acute heart failure in the emergency department should undergo an echo exam. The question is, who will do it? These are patients who are the most difficult to assess,” said Dr. Susanna Price , a member of the EACVI recommendations panel and a specialist in critical care cardiology at Royal Brompton Hospital in London.
“Without proper training, the person doing FoCUS could make a false positive diagnosis, or might miss something and make a false negative diagnosis,” said Dr. Cardim, professor and director of echocardiography and cardiac imaging at Hospital da Luz in Lisbon, and another member of the EACVI panel.
To avoid this, emergency-medicine physicians and others who often triage patients with acute heart disorders should be trained in echocardiography and especially the FoCUS exam, which aims to quickly evaluate several important abnormalities of cardiac function: pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, left and right ventricular size and function, and intravascular volume status. A FoCUS exam also screens for pulmonary embolism. FoCUS assesses each of these in a yes-or-no or present-or-absent way, information critical for guiding emergency management but lacking the quantitative and detailed information available with a comprehensive echocardiography exam.
“FoCUS must never substitute” for the comprehensive exam, which should always also be done, he said. FoCUS “should be used wisely and cautiously because of its limitations.”
The FoCUS exam also has equipment specifications. Ideally, clinicians should use a portable, hand-held ultrasound machine, which is larger than “pocket-sized” ultrasound devices and hence gives much better image quality compared with pocket-sized devices, Dr. Cardim said in an interview.
Dr. Cardim and Dr. Price had no disclosures.
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
