The original version of an article titled “N.Y. appellate court gives ‘teeth’ to mental health parity law” (published August 21, 2015) misstated the finding of the lower court; the finding was that the plaintiff had alleged plausibly that violations had occurred, not “likely” occurred. It also misquoted Dr. Bendat, who actually said, “The discrete lines puts pressure on claims administrators to make transparent the bases for their claims review procedures.”


You May Also Like

Sticks and stones: Navigating patient satisfaction scores

There is an old saying, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words ...

Opportunities and limits in universal screening for perinatal depression

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Obstetric Practice recently published ...