AT THE ECNP CONGRESS

BERLIN (FRONTLINE MEDICAL NEWS)A switch to long-acting second-generation injectable antipsychotics brought improved attitudes and beliefs regarding antipsychotic therapy among patients with schizoaffective disorder who already were stabilized on a single oral antipsychotic agent, Dr. Francesco Pietrini reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

The conventional view has been that long-acting injectable antipsychotics are most appropriate as an alternative option for patients with poor adherence to oral antipsychotics. But this small observational study suggests that the switch is beneficial in a broader population, according to Dr. Pietrini of the University of Florence (Italy).

The 18 outpatients who participated in this 12-month, prospective, observational study showed significant improvements in a variety of measures of psychopathology after the switch to long-acting injectable therapy. These benefits were accompanied by a steadily improving attitude toward treatment as reflected in rising scores on the Drug Attitude Inventory-10 ( DAI-10 ).

All patients were stable at baseline on either oral olanzapine or oral paliperidone. They were then switched to the corresponding dose of the long-acting injectable formulation of the same drug and followed prospectively for 12 months.

Mean scores on the 0-10 DAI-10 rose from 3.22 at baseline to 6.56 after 6 months on a long-acting injectable antipsychotic and 8.11 at 12 months. These improvements in scores reflect the patients’ growing endorsement of inventory items such as “taking medication will prevent me from having a breakdown,” “my thoughts are clearer on medication,” and “for me, the good things about medication outweigh the bad.”

Scores on most measures of psychopathology improved significantly from baseline during the first 6 months on long-acting therapy. The improvement was maintained but not expanded upon during the second 6 months. The exception was negative psychotic symptoms as assessed by the negative symptom scale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale ( PANSS ), which didn’t show significant improvement during the first 6 months but did in the second half of the year-long study (see chart).

Dr. Pietrini reported having no financial conflicts regarding this study, which was conducted free of commercial support.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

Ads

You May Also Like

T cells remain best urinary biomarker for lupus nephritis

T cells are still the most accurate urinary biomarker for lupus nephritis, reported Katharina ...

New approval lights up gliomas to aid resection

The Food and Drug Administration has approved aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (Gleolan) to help visualize ...